HealthIT.com
Menu

Every claim we hold, and how far we can stand behind it.

142 claims across 39 products. 28% are confirmed against the source text by the evidence gate; 39% come from a class with no vendor interest. Everything below is browsable, filterable, and available as JSON.

Evidence classClaimsConfirmedWhat it can support
Peer-reviewed study195Reviewed before publication; assess study quality, funding, conflicts, and relevance to your setting.
Regulatory filing40A statement made to a regulator, where being wrong has consequences.
Independent report329Reporting outside a vendor publication; assess underlying data, sponsorship, and conflicts separately.
Customer case43A real deployment, but selected and framed by someone with an interest.
Press release6322The vendor's own announcement. Useful for dates and facts, not for outcomes.
Vendor page201Marketing copy. Establishes what is claimed, never that it is true.

Showing 2 of 2 matching claims (142 in the full corpus) · 0% of this selection is confirmed · clear filters

  1. Raised $130M Series C led by FTV Capital, bringing total funding to $160M; 550+ health systems/hospitals/FQHCs, 80+ EHR integrations, 25+ products; customers include Banner Health, Cook County Health, Kelsey-Seybold, Montefiore

    Provenance
    Claim ID
    clm_816edc730f7e3b3b0de1
    Version
    1
    Workflow
    Patient Access & Contact Center AI
    Dimension
    market durability
    Retrieved
    2026-08-27
    Reviewer
    healthit-gate-v1
    Source URL
    https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/luma-health-raises-130-million-in-series-c-funding-to-unify-automate-and-transform-patients-healthcare-journeys-301430687.html
  2. Journal of Investigative Dermatology study (Dulmage et al., 2021;141:1230-1235, doi 10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.027) of VisualDx's point-of-care AI system found 'The AI system achieved an accuracy of 68% in determining the single most likely morphology from the test image bank', while primary care physicians scored 36% without aids and 68% with a visual guide (P < 0.001); on 222 images across Fitzpatrick skin types the AI achieved 70% accuracy in Fitzpatrick I-III and 68% in Fitzpatrick IV-VI (P = 0.79).

    VisualDxPeer-reviewed studyUnverifiedOpen source ↗
    Provenance
    Claim ID
    clm_19dcf624d235238fa2b7
    Version
    1
    Workflow
    Clinical Evidence & Decision Support
    Dimension
    evidence strength
    Retrieved
    2026-08-27
    Reviewer
    healthit-gate-v1
    Source URL
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jid.2020.08.027
Know a source we are missing?

Checking feedback availability…

Open to everyone — no account needed. This is a non-PHI service: never include patient identifiers.

We cannot action an evidence claim without something to check.

Your message is privately delivered to the editorial team. How we handle your information.