HealthIT.com
Menu

Every claim we hold, and how far we can stand behind it.

142 claims across 39 products. 28% are confirmed against the source text by the evidence gate; 39% come from a class with no vendor interest. Everything below is browsable, filterable, and available as JSON.

Evidence classClaimsConfirmedWhat it can support
Peer-reviewed study195Reviewed before publication; assess study quality, funding, conflicts, and relevance to your setting.
Regulatory filing40A statement made to a regulator, where being wrong has consequences.
Independent report329Reporting outside a vendor publication; assess underlying data, sponsorship, and conflicts separately.
Customer case43A real deployment, but selected and framed by someone with an interest.
Press release6322The vendor's own announcement. Useful for dates and facts, not for outcomes.
Vendor page201Marketing copy. Establishes what is claimed, never that it is true.

Showing 1 of 1 matching claims (142 in the full corpus) · 100% of this selection is confirmed · clear filters

  1. NEJM AI randomized trial (Dec 2025): among 238 outpatient physicians across 14 specialties (Nov 4, 2024-Jan 3, 2025) randomized to Microsoft Dragon Ambient eXperience (DAX) Copilot, Nabla, or usual care, DAX was used in 33.5% of 24,696 visits; DAX users showed no significant change in time-in-note (-1.7%; 95% CI -9.4% to +5.9%; P=0.66) but significant improvements in burnout measures (Mini-Z +2.83; PTL -39.9) versus control.

    DAX CopilotPeer-reviewed studyConfirmedOpen source ↗
    Provenance
    Claim ID
    clm_dd375bd99918073f92db
    Version
    1
    Workflow
    Ambient Clinical Documentation
    Dimension
    evidence strength
    Retrieved
    2026-08-27
    Reviewer
    healthit-gate-v1
    Source URL
    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12768499/
Know a source we are missing?

Checking feedback availability…

Open to everyone — no account needed. This is a non-PHI service: never include patient identifiers.

We cannot action an evidence claim without something to check.

Your message is privately delivered to the editorial team. How we handle your information.