Clinical evidence desk · Research preview
Build a defensible
shortlist for your next
healthcare-AI decision.
We track 39 products across 6 buyer workflows and hold every claim to one published documentary gate. Today 3 clear it. We show you which, why the rest do not, and exactly what evidence would change the answer.
A clinician, a two-partner practice, and an investor need different things from the same evidence.
Start with the question in front of you.
This desk does not collapse discovery, comparison, and monitoring into one score. Choose the evidence view that matches the decision you need to make.
What is credible in this workflow?
See the covered products, their documentary-gate status, freshness, and the evidence gap that matters most.
Explore workflows ScenarioWhich options can be compared fairly?
Open a defined buyer context. The desk refuses a ranking until candidates share that context and clear its gates.
Compare a scenario MonitoringWhat could move the shortlist?
Review the material evidence changes in this snapshot before treating a prior assessment as current.
Monitor changesThese pass the documentary gate at this snapshot.
36 of 39 products are not admissible — almost all because their newest documentary evidence is older than the freshness bar, not because the product is weak. Exclusion is a statement about our corpus, not a verdict on a vendor. See every exclusion and what would close it →
Comparisons open only on shared, explicit buyer contexts.
Enterprise ambient documentation
Health system >500 beds deploying ambient scribing system-wide on Epic.
Open comparison →Prior-auth automation under CMS-0057-F
Specialty group preparing for the Jan 2027 electronic prior-authorization mandate.
Open comparison →FDA-cleared imaging AI platforms
Radiology department evaluating triage/detection algorithms with regulatory requirements.
Open comparison →Documentary evidence, verified deployment experience, and commercial state are kept separate. Payment never changes a score, a weight, an evidence label, or placement. Every figure on this page is bound to the snapshot below and recomputable from it.
Technical provenance
snap_8a8a4c9bb810aee3 · cutoff 2026-08-27T04:05Z · score score-v0.2.0 · 42 of 142 claims independently confirmed
Need help, have feedback, or want to raise a concern?
Evidence Packets are not yet available
This research preview does not accept purchases or packet requests. Payment cannot change scores, ranking, or editorial conclusions.